Drug Test Information DetoxSecret.com

Drug Test Revealed

08.31.10

A drug test is a professional study of a biological sample including urine, hair, blood, sweat, or saliva – to confirm the presence or absence of specified parent drugs or their metabolites. Laboratory-based drug testing is done in a two-tiered way using two unique kinds of detection approaches. The first is often known as the screening test, and is administered to all specimen that enter the laboratory. The second, known as the confirmation test, is only administered to samples that test positive for the screening test. After a suspected positive specimen is discovered from screening, the specimen is marked and tested with the confirmation test. Samples that are negative on the screening test are thrown away and noted as negative. The confirmation test in a good number of laboratories is extremely specific but also moderately not cheap to administer. False positive samples from the screening test will be negative on the confirmation test. Samples testing positive for both screening and confirmation tests are reported as positive to the individual who required the screening. Several labs retain positive specimen for a period of time in case of a disputed outcome or lawsuit. For job drug testing, a positive result is ordinarily not ratified without a assessment by a Medical Review Officer that will ordinarily interview the person who failed the drug test.

No test is 100% accurate. Surveys of drug testing labs have discovered astoundingly high error rates from poor quality assurance. Although high-quality labs have added safeguards to curtail the danger of “false positives,” even if error measurements are only one in 10,000, the extension of drug testing to tens of millions of workers as necessitated by the government means that a lot of workers will be falsely accused of drug use.
Since urine tests do not detect the psychoactive ingredient of marijuana, THC, but instead alternate, nonactive metabolites, they do not assess impairment; even so, this actuality is of no importance to hiring managers in the current anti-drug hysteria. If you are looking for a job, it is prudent to expect being tested and do not use cannabis. Still, identifying that many of you may risk drug testing on short notice, you may need to buy appropriate detox products to ensure your positive outcome.

Regular hair drug test vs extended opiates hair drug test

08.31.10

Rigorous use of drug-testing has been paramount to the successes of many institutions and organizations since this broad category of product has become available to the public. None, however have been quite as impacting as the introduction of hair-testing kits for narcotics. With a common longevity of detection for upwards of ninety days, and no method to deceive or mask results, it has quickly become a favorite around people who truly are focused on eradicating drug-usage. Here we will outline the differences between an ordinary hair-testing kit and one that is specialized for extended opiate drug testing.

Testing for seven broad categories, hair-testing kits cater to cocaine,marijuana, broad spectrum opiates (codeine, heroine, or morphine bases),methamphetamine, MDMA, amphetamines, and PCP. With optimum detection found from 80-120 strands of roughly 1-1’5 inch in length, it is best NOT to collect samples from a hairbrush. Non-intrusive and extremely cost-effective considering it supplies three months worth of drug-testing in one simple procedure, it is the leader in the industry as far as accuracy and popularity is concerned, quickly becoming a favorite over more orthodox procedures such as urine or saliva testing.

Developed from a need for more particular results from opiate-based testing, the extended opiate hair-test takes on an even more aggressive approach to weeding out opiate usage by centering in identifying which exact substance is being abused. From Hydrocodone (Vicodin and Lortab), to Hydromorphone (Dilaudid), Oxycodone (Percocet/Oxycontin),Carisoprodol (Soma), the extended opiate test will begin detecting forwhich of these particular opiates is being abused and how much of if it was taken and in what sorts of intervals. While slightly more expensive then it’s counterpart which will only detect broader opiates such as heroine, or morphine, this product has certain applications which become invaluable tools for those using them.

 Knowing exactly what the problem is regarding opiates is a large factor in how to approach the situation. It is important to remember that synthetic opiates such as oxycodone and hydrocodone have a much shorter-lived withdrawal dependency than something like morphine and heroine which literally clings itself to the bone marrow of a an individual and can afflict him for a year or more after he’s stopped using. When the unknown has presented itself regarding opiates, it is the opinion of almost every professional in this field to do everything possible to guarantee one knows what the problem is. Most heroine users who intend to keep using, especially at a young age, will try to convince their parents it is only a synthetic pharmaceutical. 

When deciding to purchase either product, the factors determining which to go with should be simple. If opiates aren’t even considered a possibility, and the test is really to test for other narcotics, it’s an obvious choice to purchase an ordinary drug testing kit. However if opiates are suspected, or if the subject in question is a child who may be inclined to lie about the usage, a sound choice would be a hair-follicle extended opiate testing kit. 

Accuracy of Drug Testing

08.31.10

With virtually no way of violating any personal and private issues, it has quickly become a favorite among those testing athletes, the military, and law enforcement agencies due to it’s prolonged rate of detection and inability to alter or fraud.

Tested from sixty to eighty strands of hair which are extracted and carefully stored in the container provided, the possibility for fraud only exists by submitting the hair of  someone else. With an extremely broad window of detection which is commonly in the neighborhood of ninety days, each half inch of hair will essentially enable you to thirty days of detection,to the maximum possibility of ninety.

With a prolonged range of detection, the inability to alter or mask it, the guarantee provided by collecting hair samples which in no reasonable way should violate any privacy issues which might be raised, only two true inherent flaw exists with this method of testing. Firstly, with all samples being required to be sent to a laboratory for proper analysis, the time expectancy for this test can vary greatly, most of which depending on the volume currently being handled by whatever laboratory or company is hosting the testing. Secondly is the cost of such a test is nowhere near as inexpensive as those used to test urine and saliva; what you are paying for in this instance is the simple guarantee that no product on the market could have possibly breached any safety solutions used to counter masking and altering products.  Everything is carefully scrutinized and each sample examined by a trained professional, the value and guarantee provided by hair analysis easily outweighs any cost when suspicion that  other methods of testing may be abused or altered. No greater guarantee exists in the industry then the one provided by hair analysis; it is easily collected, has the longest window of detection, and cannot be altered or masked. Something to keep in mind is that it is able to test and differentiate synthetic opiates such as oxycodone (Percocet), hydrocodone (Vikodin),morphine, codeine, methamphetamines such as speed or ecstasy, amphetamines such as adderall and dexedrine, it provides what very urine-analysis under a laboratory can pin-point. With a heightened cost over any other method of testing, it is only fit that the results are received extremely quickly;one day for a negative result, two days for positive. It remains the most effective and accurate and least intrusive method of testing known on the market.

 In the 21st century, where every dollar and cent is carefully scrutinized, it has become commonplace for most facilities and institutions to complain about the cost of initiating programs to uncover potential drug abuse amongst employees, students, athletes, or family members. Over the course of the last decade a great number of enhancements and modifications have taken place throughout the drug-testing industry to standardize saliva testing and guarantee it as an effective method of monitoring for narcotics. Without a doubt the most cost effective way to rapid-test for drugs, it is also quickly gaining a reputation as among the more versatile methods of testing, enabling certain drugs to be tested for use within the last few hours of consumption, showing you whether someone may be a chronic or casual user; a vital concern to some in particular situations.

 With issues concerning privacy being constantly raised by those accused of drug violations in regards to forced submission of urine-analysis. They are often approached by a person in a position of authority. The reasoning behind testing for narcotics and alcohol can range from the necessities and requirements of a athletic commission to the consequences of actions which at times can only be attributed to assumption, to the mandatory policy of a new work place. At times this has conclusively led to abuse at the hands of those persons in a position of authority, and while rare and few and far between, a genuine method of drug testing for saliva exists which can easily look past any violations of privacy or gender rights. 

A few informative things to keep in mind when deciding to use saliva testing is to very carefully read the instructions provided with the product; many manufacturers have specific enviromental conditions such as how much time elapsed from the time of the last meal, to ensuring that the proper amount of saliva is extracted, to ensuring the saliva is properly placed and in some cases smeared where it is supposed to. This method of testing is highly volatile to deviation from the instructions provided and under no circumstance should any breeched or exposed test be attempted for use; because of it’s sensitivity, it will almost certainly not work properly.

 Benefits of saliva testing are very specific. It is that it is among the easiest and least intrusive methods of testing;  it is the least expensive, it takes virtually no time at all to see the results after a sample has been properly collected. Coupled with the  ability to re-test at virtually no increased cost, it has  and will remain popular with a broad assortment of people who are in need of the specific benefits provided.  If the instructions are carefully read and followed, it is among the easiest methods of testing as far as human error is concerned; it requires no special training and only minimal caution is required when handling a sample. To those considering the implementation of drug testing for a child or a spouse or colleague, this is often the prime candidate of testing.